Refuting the 5 Factor Model: Best Practice Requires a Systemic Approach to PCCP (Parent-Child Contact Problems)
Course: Refuting the 5 Factor Model: Best Practice Requires a Systemic Approach to PCCP (Parent-Child Contact Problems)
Instructor: Benjamin D. Garber, Ph.D.
Approved for 3.0 Hours of CE Credit
Fulfills License Requirements
Program Description:
Today’s family courts commonly face the dilemma of the polarized child, the son or daughter who aligns with parent A and resists or refuses contact with Parent B. This advanced training eschews binary either-or approaches to these parent-child contact problems (PCCP). In particular, the “Five Factor Model” (FFM; Bernet and Greenhill, 2022) is dissected and found to be biased and illogical. The FFM promotes an artificial alienation versus estrangement, good guy versus bad guy approach that exacerbates family conflict. For all of its recipe-like appeal, the FFM is rejected in favor of a systemically-informed or ecological model of PCCP. A rubric is proposed with which evaluators, Guardians ad litem, work product reviewers, and finders-of-fact can minimize bias, avoid premature closure, and organize the complexity of conflicted family system dynamics in the best interests of the child.
Goals & Objectives:
At the conclusion of this program, participants will be able to:
- Explain why family law matters are about relationships, not individuals.
- Recognize and eschew binary approaches to Parent Child Contact Problems (PCCP).
- Describe the Ecological Model and be able to use the Rubric to guide evaluation of Parent-Child Contact Problems (PCCP).
Priming Questions
- Are you saying that alienation doesn’t occur in conflicted families?
- What wording would you recommend the Court use when ordering a family systems evaluation?
- These evaluations are already long and very expensive. Are you suggesting that we need to make them even longer?
- How do Five Factor Model advocates respond to your position?
View this faculty member's book on Amazon >